Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B" Results 5061 - 5080 of 5,815
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2009, 9:23 am
But no matter how many questions you asked, no matter how hard you tried, you would not be able to make out a legally valid case that the Sherman Act was violated. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:24 am
Butler County Court of Common Pleas Judge Marilyn J. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm
However under the tests set out by Arden J in Hanoman v Southwark L B C [2008] AER(D) 146 [para 47] (our note here), there was a collateral contract in this case, “The terms of the collateral contract can be gleaned from the documents signed by Miss Scrowther, the letter sent by Mr Botsford on 3rd October 2006 and the FAQs and the fact that Miss Scrowther signed the authority and paid over the £31,250 to Watermill on completion”. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:41 pm
  In that case, Cohen J. found, at para. 73, "although I find that the defendant had a cell phone in his vehicle, I cannot conclude t [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:20 pm
CIPO announced a new Practice Direction on the test that the Patent Office will apply in assessing obviousness in light of Rothstein J. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
The agreement resolves EPA allegations that from April to June 2008 J&J Cores failed to continuously monitor and record temperatures of the afterburner that controls hazardous air pollutant emissions from its sweat furnace. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:37 pm by Juan Antunez
The essential elements of the doctrine are that the parties and issues be identical, and that the particular matter be fully litigated and determined in a contest which results in a final decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:28 pm
My J Street button said "Pro-Israel, Pro-Peace. [read post]