Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 42,203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2022, 4:15 pm
Your lawyer can help you gather and then organize the evidence you need to submit when suing for a dog bite injury in California. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 3:35 pm
The multitude of laws that affect these matters are contained in the statute, case law and various procedural rules established by the Illinois Supreme Court and the local Trial Court supervising your divorce case. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:55 pm
It does not matter whether you are guilty of driving under the influence. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:01 pm
Friday's ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:46 am
When a section 2-1401 petition is premised on newly discovered evidence, “the petitioner must show the new evidence was not known to [him or] her at the time of the proceeding and could not have been discovered by the petitioner with the exercise of reasonable diligence. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
TM law has relaxed its rules in a modern economy. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
As such, substantial evidence supports the Board's conclusion that claimant did not and could not comply with the reporting requirements from Egypt (see Labor Law § 596; 12 NYCRR 473.1, 473.2, 473.3; Matter of Inatomi [Commissioner of Labor], 116 AD3d 1332, 1333 [2014]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
As such, substantial evidence supports the Board's conclusion that claimant did not and could not comply with the reporting requirements from Egypt (see Labor Law § 596; 12 NYCRR 473.1, 473.2, 473.3; Matter of Inatomi [Commissioner of Labor], 116 AD3d 1332, 1333 [2014]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
Consequently, as there was no medical evidence establishing a recognizable link between claimant's injuries and repetitive movements associated with her work activities, substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that claimant did not establish that she sustained a causally-related occupational disease (see Matter of Patalan v PAL Envtl., 202 AD3d at 1253; Matter of Barker v New York City Police Dept., 176 AD3d at 1272-1273; Matter… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
Consequently, as there was no medical evidence establishing a recognizable link between claimant's injuries and repetitive movements associated with her work activities, substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that claimant did not establish that she sustained a causally-related occupational disease (see Matter of Patalan v PAL Envtl., 202 AD3d at 1253; Matter of Barker v New York City Police Dept., 176 AD3d at 1272-1273; Matter… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:32 pm
" Abortion is not a simple matter of access to health care. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:54 am
We have evidence, however, of a more complicated and chaotic outcome. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:13 am
It felt nerve-racking to see the specialists continually scratch their heads because once you’ve ruled out the obvious possibilities, you’re left with rare and devastating options. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:52 am
But an administrative investigation for alleged "harassment" strikes me as a much more serious matter. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Other place we focus on D’s use is dilution, which seems to imply that the D must be using the matter as “a mark or trade name. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:14 am
The Federal Circuit concluded that placing the stock in a blind trust is not divestment and Judge Morgan was disqualified under the statute, and the ruling was vacated. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:01 am
This expectation is a reasonable one as a matter of probability. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:12 am
Responding to requests for evidence can take significant amounts of time. [read post]
