Search for: "Mark Wells "
Results 5061 - 5080
of 46,880
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2007, 4:30 am
A dearth of PTO evidence led the Board to reverse a Section 2(e)(1) refusal of the mark FOLDOVER for "[p]roviding temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for use in creating web-based advertisements" in Class 42. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 9:46 am
The book, 15 Mistakes That Will Wreck Your Texas Accident Case, is written by Mark A. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 6:17 am
" Mark is fond of arguing that legalization would result in increasing drug use but he rarely provides any evidence to support his assertions. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 11:34 am
The objects of this general theme have been conferences concerning aspects of religious freedom as well as the legal and political implications of the concept of tradition. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:09 am
A video of Mark Zaid's exhibit talk, "Superheroes in Court! [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:36 pm
Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce said of the recent decisions, “We continue to believe that requiring employers to post this notice is well within the Board’s authority, and that it provides a genuine service to employees who may not otherwise know their rights under our law. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 11:28 pm
Without the existence of a registered trade mark, it is almost impossible to act against counterfeiters in Africa, especially in those territories where common law rights or protection of well-known trade marks is not recognised. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:25 am
Frankly, it probably wouldn’t even occur to them because the marks are so different. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:58 am
Frankly, it probably wouldn’t even occur to them because the marks are so different. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 9:31 am
The new trade mark categories comprise the non-traditional trade marks of sound, scent, holographic and trade dress, as well as collective trade marks, certification trade marks, and protection for famous and well known marks. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
and that Coley's use of the mark was without due cause. [read post]
8 May 2022, 1:43 am
However, the Registrar is not permitted to determine ex officio whether a bad faith objection that he has raised is well-founded. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:34 am
Well, before the Kat's colleague could decide whether to be a devil or not, the piece which you can below was received from someone who had already decided on a bit of devilry -- Katfriend Désirée Fields (McDermott Will & Emery UK LLP). [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:55 am
Delegates will hear the perspective of both a mediator as well as that of a lawyer representing a client at mediation and how a lawyer can help. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:07 am
" Petitioner submitted testimony regarding policing of its mark, as well as evidence of agreements with other entities, containing various restrictions regarding use. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:01 am
Pictures of marks are in the public domain. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:52 am
It would have allowed US intent to use as well as foreign nationals; cancellation for nonuse couldn’t commence for three years after, though damages would be limited. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:49 pm
" By failing to disclose the non-compliant marking, Victaulic avoided the payment of marking duties.How could CFI possibly know that the pipe fittings were improperly marked? [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 1:20 am
One should avoid – once again – any automatism and think that just because ‘CHIARA’ comes before ‘FERRAGNI’, it is more important than this.As such, also the aural similarity between the signs ‘CHIARA’ and ‘CHIARA FERRAGNI’ should be regarded as average if not even low.Conceptual similarity: non-existentTurning to the final type of similarity assessment, the applicant submitted that ‘CHIARA FERRAGNI’ enjoys a repute that… [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:53 am
The Board pointed out that this does not constitute an available claim: "It is well-settled that the adequacy of specimens submitted during the prosecution of an application is solely a matter of ex parte examination and, therefore, does not constitute grounds for opposing the registration of a mark. [read post]
