Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IAM) Lost knowledge (IP Spotlight) Nobel Prize winning physicist R B Laughlin explains how IP damages innovation (Techdirt) US v China IP case before the World Trade Organisation - differing news on who won or lost (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) (Chinese Law Prof Blog) WIPO Assemblies conclude (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) Global – Trade Marks / Brands Trade mark marking strategy - R… [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Dustcontrol International (EPLAW) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): Infringement action won't be stayed pending foreign decision in non-patent claim: Elmotech Ltd & Anor v Guidance Ltd & Anor (PatLit) United States US General Director Kappos testimony to Congress (Patently-O) Judge Michel: USPTO should receive $1 billion infusion of cash (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) The US Reporting on IPRs - the Watch List (IP tango) Industrial design in… [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:03 pm
CDC Newburgh Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm
A description from the Press:In 2011, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1973, authorizing its member states to take measures to protect Libyan civilians from Muammar Gadhafi’s forces. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 3:47 am
Sage Dining Services, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:45 am
Brunetti appealed this rejection to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which found this prohibition on immoral or scandalous marks to be in violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:12 pm
"The decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:49 pm
United Techs. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
Matthew Guarnieri, assistant to the solicitor general, argues for the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:15 am
Neary and his father London Borough of Hillingdon v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm
One need only reflect on the fact that more than 1,000 qui tam actions for false marking were filed by opportunistic plaintiffs following the 2009 Federal Circuit decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
See Montgomery v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
Prudential, a global insurance company, trademarked PRU and other PRU-formative marks in the United States and other countries (but not China) in 2002. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:00 am
United States, Polygamy, and Imperialism, (William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-43, Feb. 26, 2010).Jill I. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 7:48 am
The guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
