Search for: "Park v State"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 11,299
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2015, 7:37 am
Supreme Court (Tolan v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The challenge reached the state’s highest court, the New York Court of Appeals, which issued a strangely reasoned opinion, People v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
Zelinski v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
United States Illinois Appellate Court Resolves Breach of Lease Agreement Because of Damage to Property [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:39 pm
Park, J.D. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:59 am
In her concurring opinion in US v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:44 am
For support, the author of the dissent cites only his own previous speculation, see Gonzalez v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:41 pm
Further, as the state high court explained in Dorshkind v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:36 pm
Park, J.D. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm
Moje v. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 5:41 am
” Never one to let law or constitutional rights get in the way of some feelz of his own: It has been legal for women to go topless in New York since 1992, when the state’s Court of Appeals ruled in People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:05 am
In First Bostonview Management, LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:20 pm
Finkel Last week, the Second Circuit affirmed a lower court decision in Chen v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 10:06 pm
” However, Contrary to defendant’s argument, there were no provisions in section 160A–372 authorizing the Town to make its development approval contingent on securing funds to subsidize its law enforcement, fire protection, and parks, which was the stated purpose of the APFO. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 3:05 pm
In the mid-1990s Trump wanted to build a limousine parking lot for the hotel, so he bought several nearby properties. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm
Disability discrimination remains a persistent problem that needs more attention by employers,” said Anna Park, regional attorney for EEOC’s Los Angeles District. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:09 am
Similarly, the court rejected the application of Brennan v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:51 pm
Div. 2007) State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:55 am
Basically, they are: 1) the statutory law exception of Scolaro v Ohio University; 2) a lease or other contract may create a duty/obligation to remove ice and snow; 3) if you undertake to remove snow/ice, you can be held liable if you do so negligently, or in a way that makes the area more hazardous than it had been without your efforts at snow removal; and 4) you may be held liable for unnatural accumulations of ice which result, for example from the negligent design of a parking… [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:23 am
Cablevision Systems Corp. v. [read post]
