Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 178,514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2024, 6:14 pm
In contrast, to make a claim for tortious interference with prospective business relations, the plaintiff needs to prove: 1) A reasonable expectation of entering into a valid business relationship 2) The defendant had knowledge of the plaintiff’s expectancy 3) The defendant intentionally and unjustifiably interfered with the expectancy, causing a termination of the expectancy 4) The defendant’s interference resulted in damages to the… [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:02 pm
Therefore, the court affirmed the trial court’s decision to deny the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that there were unresolved questions regarding the defendant’s negligence and its relationship to the plaintiff’s injuries, regardless of the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s opposition. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 5:41 pm
A group of plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit in the Central District of California against the NFL seeking $6.1 billion in damages alleging that the league’s club members conspired to suppress out-of-market telecasts of football games with the NFL’s broadcast partners. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:00 pm
Under 8.01-233(B), however, “[i]f the subject matter of the counterclaim…arises out of the same transaction or occurrence upon which the plaintiff’s claim is based, the statute of limitations with respect to [the counterclaim] shall be tolled by the commencement of the plaintiff’s action. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:40 pm
" The threats the plaintiff alleged included the defendant posting on social media a picture of the plaintiff as a juvenile; posting the plaintiff's husband's obituary, which included the names of the plaintiff's children; "using [the plaintiff's] photo to slander government agencies;" and stating that "she will do whatever it takes to take [the plaintiff] down. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
” In response to Justice Kagan’s concern, Jason Murray (counsel for the Anderson respondents) wisely signaled that it’s not the plaintiffs’ objective to have Colorado, or Wisconsin, or Michigan, unilaterally determine Trump’s eligibility: They brought this case so that the Supreme Court itself could made a definitive, uniform determination for the nation. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm
The fact that shareholders approved the grant does not make the suit go away if, as the plaintiff asserts, the proxy statement is defective. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 12:02 pm
” Given Delaware’s recent shift from its typically non-compete friendly stance, the Delaware Supreme Court’s ruling is beneficial for employers. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:00 am
As a result, if passed, the law could open the floodgates to new litigation as class action plaintiffs ask courts to evaluate these additional expanded provisions. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 10:53 am
Department of Justice, representing the Defendant’s perspective; and Thomas Peckham of Nordhaus Law Firm, LLC representing the Tribal Plaintiffs’ perspective. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 10:17 am
S. ____ (2024), the U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:35 am
However, the court emphasized that the plaintiff was not the defendant’s direct employee, nor was the defendant insured for masonry subcontractor’s employees. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
According to Plaintiff’s counsel, this trust is what led him to believe that Bouvier was acting in Rybolovlev’s best interests, instead of his own. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Currently, personal injury plaintiffs can recover up to $935,000 in non-economic damages in Maryland. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 8:38 am
"What’s disheartening is that it took more than a decade and countless hours by a team of lawyers to win a jury verdict in our case when the verdict on human-caused global warming was rendered decades ago.... [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 8:38 am
Today's advance release tort law opinion: Cameron v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 8:23 am
To hold a defendant liable for negligence, the plaintiff must prove that a defendant’s negligent behavior was the actual and “legal” cause of the accident. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 8:00 am
Havel et al (ND, filed 5/18/2022) – One of the Plaintiff’s attorneys filed a motion to withdraw on January 30, 2024. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 7:25 am
Therefore, the potential harm to plaintiff’s members and the broader implications for constitutional rights underscored the lack of public interest in enforcing this statute. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:34 am
This case, involving an organization that supports LGBTQ-identifying people, is dismissed because the plaintiff lacks standing to challenge the federal government's policy that would allow federal grant recipients to discriminate against people on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [read post]
