Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 5061 - 5080 of 7,646
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
JURIST, CBS News, and Politico have coverage of the federal government’s brief in support of the university, which Kiran also featured in yesterday’s round-up. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm by John Bellinger
 Twenty-nine supplemental briefs were filed in mid-July in support of the plaintiff-petitioners, more than doubling the 14 briefs filed in support of the plaintiff-petitioners in the first round. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the Court granted cert. in Chafin v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:08 am by Justin P. Webb
Well, it appears the government continues to have issues in this regard.In United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:08 am by Justin P. Webb
Well, it appears the government continues to have issues in this regard.In United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:27 am by Rachel Sachs
At the Huffington Post, Scottie Thomaston has coverage of an amicus brief filed recently by Indiana and fourteen other states in Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
June 23, 2011) (allegation that defendant “failed to train, warn or educate” physicians failed to state a plausible claim because no such duty exists); Lemon v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:51 am by Cormac Early
Berman of the Sentencing Law and Policy blog reports on a Florida case which “spotlights an on-going struggle for state courts” to follow the Court’s decision in Graham v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:29 pm
Decision The case came before Arnold J in Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft v Round and Metal Ltd and another [2012] EWHC 2099 (Pat) (27 July 2012). [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:29 pm
Decision The case came before Arnold J in Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft v Round and Metal Ltd and another [2012] EWHC 2099 (Pat) (27 July 2012). [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
If so, then governmental attempts to pressure manufacturers into not selling such guns to the public would likely themselves be unconstitutional conditions, unless manufacturers could still sell the guns through affiliate corporations, see Planned Parenthood of Mid-Missouri & Eastern Kansas, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:01 am by Nabiha Syed
Yesterday the University of Texas at Austin filed its brief on the merits in Fisher v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
(credit) Previous entries on this site have covered the Alien Tort Statute, as well as Kiobel v. [read post]