Search for: "S. C." Results 5061 - 5080 of 142,045
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2015, 10:26 pm
This collaborative spirit shines in Hasta La Victoria Siempre, c/s, a print by Luis (or Louie ‘the Foot’ González), based on his brother Héctor’s photograph of a United Farm Workers pro-labor rally. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 12:17 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
This collaborative spirit shines in Hasta La Victoria Siempre, c/s, a print by Luis (or Louie ‘the Foot’ González), based on his brother Héctor’s photograph of a United Farm Workers pro-labor rally. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Allan Blutstein
Cal.) -- finding that Department of Labor’s properly relied on Exemptions 6 and 7(C) to withhold certain third-party information from documents she maintained on her work computer. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
We welcome as this month's guest blogger Matthew Mirow, professor of law at the Florida International University College of Law  The holder of doctorates in law from Leiden and Cambridge universities, as well as a JD from Cornell, Professor Mirow is the author of Latin American Law: A History of Private Law and Institutions in Spanish America (University of Texas Press, 2004); Florida’s First Constitution: The Constitution of Cádiz (Carolina Academic… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:10 am by Michael Geist
Last week, Canadian Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault introduced Bill C-10, legislation that would significantly reform Canada’s Broadcasting Act. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 6:21 am
This week, we’ve looked at diversity in the C-Suite–or perhaps more accurately, the lack of diversity in the C-Suite. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:20 am by Laura Orr
The O(range) C(ounty) Bar Association monthly OC Lawyer Magazine, once again brings us Justice Bedsworth with a cautionary tale (and a guffaw): “Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Typos . . . [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 1:42 pm by coleccionespr
En cambio, las resoluciones de la cámara y las resoluciones concurrentes sí podrán ser consideradas en el transcurso de una sesión extraordinaria. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:45 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, conceding that under the circumstances granting Petitioner §607-c "would further the legislative purpose of awarding benefits to correction officers injured in the discharge of their duties ... the restrictive language of Retirement and Social Security Law §607-c precludes such award here, as [Petitioner's] injuries were not caused by the acts of an inmate or person confined in an institution" and confirmed the… [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:45 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, conceding that under the circumstances granting Petitioner §607-c "would further the legislative purpose of awarding benefits to correction officers injured in the discharge of their duties ... the restrictive language of Retirement and Social Security Law §607-c precludes such award here, as [Petitioner's] injuries were not caused by the acts of an inmate or person confined in an institution" and confirmed the… [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:12 am by tracey
Mahamdia v People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria: (Case C-154/11);  [2012] WLR (D)  218 “An embassy situated in a member state of the European Union was an ‘establishment’ within the meaning of article 18(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, in the context of a dispute concerning a contract of employment concluded by the embassy on behalf of the sending state, where the functions carried out by the employee did not fall within… [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Steve Statsinger
§ 3582(c)(2).The case has a long procedural history. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 10:10 am by Walter Olson
In that period, Montgomery County – which has 972,000 residents vs. the District’s 599,000 – paid $8.5 million in settlements. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 9:11 am by admin
  No (2%) The correct answer is indeed “c. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 12:37 pm by Krzysztof Pacula
This question arose in the context of the proceedings on a follow-on action, based on the Commission’s decision, by which the applicant claims damages for loss and damage caused by certain anticompetitive practices. [read post]