Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 5061 - 5080 of 9,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Ken White
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am by Lyle Denniston
In the 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
District Court Judge in Michigan issued recently in a civil suit:  Enjaian v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
First up, a case that, after a delayed-record relist and two reschedules, has now earned its first legit relist. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:15 pm by Cody Poplin
India’s constitution sets out the boundaries and size of each province and state in a section of the document called the “First Schedule. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by Terry Hart
Last fall, a federal judge in the Southern District Court of New York ruled that a news monitoring service’s copying of a news channel’s “broadcast content for indexing and clipping services to its subscribers constitutes fair use. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:34 am by MBettman
On June 9, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
Supreme Court ever ruled that an act of Congress violated the First Amendment. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Last year it became the first UK newspaper to win the Pulitzer Prize for the Edward Snowden revelations about US state surveillance. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am by Bob Eisenbach
They ‘serve as judicial officers of the United States district court,’ §151, and collectively ‘constitute a unit of the district court’ for that district, §152(a)(1). [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am by Bob Eisenbach
They ‘serve as judicial officers of the United States district court,’ §151, and collectively ‘constitute a unit of the district court’ for that district, §152(a)(1). [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:27 am by Ronald Mann
The Court extended that decision twice – first in Granfinanciera SA v. [read post]