Search for: "State v. Governor" Results 5061 - 5080 of 7,058
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am by Matthew Flinn
As noted above, similar questions were considered in Lumba, and also in the more recent case of R (Kambadzi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 1 WLR 1299, which was the subject of a [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:01 am by Rosalind English
An obligation imposed by the State on a prisoner to use a bucket to urinate or defecate was not in itself a violation of Article 3. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:48 pm
  Well, here’s the thing: Both Mitt Romney and Rick Perry, when governors, had reasonably humane immigration policies (to the extent that states can have immigration policies), but each has tried to run away from his record in the GOP primary race. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:36 pm by Jeralyn
Additionally, in developing this proposed regulation, the CDCR was guided by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Baze v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:07 pm by Kyle Graham
Hurley passed away in 2009, after a lengthy career in which, among other honors, he served on the Board of Governors of the California State Bar. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm by Guest Blogger
Thirty-four percent of all Americans living in 1868 lived in States with such clauses in their State constitutions. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:35 pm
Under state law he can raise and spend as much money as he wants, and he's already spent $2.2 million on advertising. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
The Act allows the developer of a leadership project to apply to the governor for streamlining benefits. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  Our mission is to show that originalism leads to Justice Ginsburg’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:25 pm
This act shall take effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August 10, 2011, if adjournment sine die is on May 11, 2011); except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part shall not take effect unless approved by the… [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Lyle Denniston
In urging Supreme Court review, the state’s petition (Arizona v. [read post]