Search for: "State v. Levell " Results 5061 - 5080 of 29,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 10:13 am by Jody Simon
It also benefits the agency’s lower-level clients by giving them preferred access to jobs on that show. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
 Seems to me that the City wins that case.At a facial level, it would seem bizarre to me that a harsher ordinance that allowed a seizure forever (or for 1000 years) would be constitutional and yet a lesser ordinance that allowed a seizure for 30 days would suddenly become unconstitutional, no? [read post]
20 May 2019, 7:30 am
Section IV highlights the problems in current patent agent privilege laws at the federal and state level. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:43 am by Theresa Lee and Emily Zhang
With legislative districts — at the state or the congressional level — there is always another election coming up for which those fighting a partisan gerrymander must litigate expeditiously to get relief in time. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:00 am by Isabel McArdle
CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) Read judgment As readers of this blog will know, control orders have often been successfully challenged in the courts on human rights grounds. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Gorsuch is analyzing this issue at a different level than his colleagues. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:57 am by Daniel Suhr
” All executive power resides in the Governor (there are interesting wrinkles on the state level with elected cabinet officers, something that doesn’t exist at the federal level). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am by Adam Baker
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 6:38 am by INFORRM
On the level of damages, the Fourth Section court said (at §69) that while it was not possible to conclude that there was no harm at all to RR’s right to a reputation and honour, it was ‘difficult to accept that the injury to his reputation in the present case was of such a level of seriousness as to justify an award of that size’. [read post]