Search for: "State v. Sales" Results 5061 - 5080 of 20,371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 am by Ronald Mann
Next Tuesday’s argument in Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 12:51 pm by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court heard oral argument this morning in a dispute between technology giant Apple and a group of iPhone users over the sale of apps from Apple’s App Store. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
Stated differently, each settlement reaches farther than a cure based on rewording a label or an ad—effectively eliminating an entire channel of competitive advertising at the key moment when the consumer is considering a purchase. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Camuso‘s holding is reminiscent of Congel v Malfitano, 31 NY3d 272 [2018]. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
United States The internet cases blog has covered the case of Benson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 5:54 am
Rather, the Court stated that “Section 10(b) reaches the use of a manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance only in connection with the purchase or sale of a security listed on an American stock exchange, and the purchase or sale of any other security in the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As recently as this Order to Show Cause, Defendant has stated — notably for the first time — that a sheriff’s sale would afford the opportunity to “consider trying to borrow money (if he could) and buy [the malpractice cause(s) of action] for himself in order to protect his former attorneys [*4](including a childhood friend) from frivolous and legally-baseless claims” (Def Memo at 16). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 12:36 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court sales tax ruling in South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
The French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation) put an end to all suspense and resistance, stating it was perfectly legal for a contract to stipulate that the buyer bears the re-sale right royalty in the context of a sale between professionals, thereby siding with the CJEU (here). [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 6:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
A valued sales employee may have selling responsibility only on the west coast, but her company may be situated in New York or Florida. [read post]