Search for: "TOWNING v. STATE"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 5,893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2009, 4:43 am
Native Village of Kivalina v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 8:08 pm
State. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:19 am
I graduated from Albany Law School in 1995 and was admitted to the New York State Bar in 1996. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 9:22 am
I graduated from Albany Law School in 1995 and was admitted to the New York State Bar in 1996. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
"Dragged it kicking and screaming, for it was Justice who ordered Texas to integrate its public schools in 1971 -- 17 years after the Supreme Court's Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 2:15 pm
Our friend, Joshua Stein, asked real-estate attorneys what they thought of the Court of Appeals's decision in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
Brian Hall, at Employer Law Report, provides an update on another important case, Pietrylo v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:52 am
Town of Brookhaven, 848 N.Y.S.2d 214 (N.Y. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:42 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
The Court summarised the guidance in South Bucks District Council v Porter [2003] 2AC 558 on the discretion under Section 187 B of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as follows: (1) The principal purpose of the jurisdiction to grant an injunction under section 187 B is to promote compliance with planning law. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 3:01 am
More about Klumpp v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:55 am
Town of MilanU.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 2:00 am
Effective immediately, the consumer protection board may promulgate any rule or regulation necessary for the timely implementation of this act on its effective date Last Act: 10/09/09 signed chap.483484
A8397A
Gottfried -- Relates to pre-natal programs and services; repealer BLURB : Pub Heal. pre-natal programs
Chapter
Signed Date
Effective Date484
10/09/2009
provided that: (a) the amendments to subd 8 of §… [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 3:31 pm
In today’s case (Prednichuk v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
That ruling, U.S. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:53 pm
Town of Brookhaven, 12 NY 3d 738. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
" They also argue the ESDC failed "to weigh the public benefit that will be realized by the seizure against the benefit that will accrue to the recipient of [the] property," as required under Aspen Creek Estates, Ltd. v Town of Brookhaven (12 NY3d 735). [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 6:05 am
§ 785.11 and 12; Holzapfel v. [read post]
