Search for: "United States v. Heard"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 8,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
It appears that the Department sent the notice of disciplinary action by Certified Mail but that the envelope was returned as "unclaimed" by the United States Postal Service. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:28 am
Tavera's motion for a new trial based on the Brady failure was still pending when the Sixth Circuit decided, in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 1:00 am
The Second Circuit’s decision in Agrawal is puzzling if not downright shocking to those familiar with the Second Circuit’s decision last April in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:29 am
As I explained then, Nokia holds a patent on the differentiating aspect of this microphone technology in the United States, but the related European patent application had not been granted, which is why the Dutch court did not order a recall. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:59 pm
(Will Baude) While I am reprising themes from prior posts, I thought I would also note that the Fifth Circuit heard argument today in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 6:53 am
s environment in the United States was a stable and happy one. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:20 am
The Gibbons Employment & Labor Law Department regularly handles the defense of retaliation and discrimination claims in both state and federal courts. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm
United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175 (1949) (emphasis added): In dealing with probable cause, however, as the very name implies, we deal with probabilities. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
I just watched the live webcast of today's hearing of the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights of the Judiciary Committee of the United States Senate on "Standard Essential Patent [SEP] Disputes and Antitrust Law". [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 5:15 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:52 am
In his Microsoft v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:02 am
United States case the Court decided last year. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 3:02 pm
In Battaglia v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:22 pm
Case scheduled Sep 11, 2013 10:00 a.m. in United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Howard T. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
This judge began his analysis of the motion by noting that to “`“state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of State law. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
United Fire Lloyds. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:49 am
In the case, Battaglia v. [read post]
