Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 5061 - 5080
of 7,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:47 am
As Moncrieffe v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Barasch v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 6:53 am
The United States Supreme Court discussed the historical origins of the right to a jury trial in the case of Duncan v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:53 pm
State Univ. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:08 pm
Promenade at Playa Vista Homeowners Association v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:55 pm
At the fact-finding hearing, the State must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that there has been an act of abuse or neglect committed by the parent or other person charged with a legal duty of care for the minor child. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:52 am
United States Jaycees; the Court distinguished Matthews v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
(Gillan and Quinton v United Kingdom (2009) The search powers of security personnel at airports were qualitatively different, said the Court. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 1:03 pm
As I’ve noted in earlier posts, § 1983 creates a civil cause of action for those deprive someone of “any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution” and laws of the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:48 am
Minors. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
The possibility looms that a state employer might on the one hand be required by Title VII to eliminate facially race-neutral procedures or policies that have a disparate impact on minorities, and on the other hand be constitutionally forbidden to discard or change those policies implemented to benefit those minorities. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:38 pm
The Eleventh Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
If she thought your travel was “not in the interest of the United States,” then you stayed home. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 6:49 pm
From the Project's 'About' tab:The Oyez Project at Chicago-Kent is a multimedia archive devoted to the Supreme Court of the United States and its work. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
In Levin v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 3:27 am
When the United States Supreme Court takes a case and rules, it applies to all. [read post]
