Search for: "ADOPTION OF S E" Results 5081 - 5100 of 15,530
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2019, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 U Joon Sung v Park  2019 NY Slip Op 30107(U)  January 11, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 159279/2015 Judge: Kathryn E. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:20 pm by Stephen Page
Example: • reading a person’s SMS messages • monitoring a person’s email account or internet browser history • monitoring a person’s account with a social networking internet site • using a GPS device to track a person’s movements • checking the recorded history in a person’s GPS device "unlawful stalking" see the Criminal Code , section 359B. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:34 pm by Thomas J. McGoey II and Philip Dore
The Court held that the “wholly groundless” test adopted by several circuit courts is inconsistent with the text of the FAA and the Court’s past decisions: “When the parties’ contract delegates the arbitrability question to an arbitrator, the court may not override the contract. [read post]
The Court held that the “wholly groundless” test adopted by several circuit courts is inconsistent with the text of the FAA and the Court’s past decisions: “When the parties’ contract delegates the arbitrability question to an arbitrator, the court may not override the contract. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:34 pm by Thomas J. McGoey II and Philip Dore
The Court held that the “wholly groundless” test adopted by several circuit courts is inconsistent with the text of the FAA and the Court’s past decisions: “When the parties’ contract delegates the arbitrability question to an arbitrator, the court may not override the contract. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The Law Commission study At about the same time as the Uniform Law Conference of Canada was adopting the Uniform Electronic Commerce Act, which Ontario’s statute basically implements, the Law Commission of England and Wales was considering the legal status of electronic signatures. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm by Rory Little
” Thomas concludes that Congress intended to adopt this common-law concept in the ACCA, and that Florida’s robbery statute is consistent with it. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
"The breadth and scope of the regulations, and the process by which the Attorney General adopted the regulations, do not demonstrate a careful calculation of the speech interests involved. [read post]
Gorsuch next pointed out that, although the Medicare Act adopts the APA’s good-cause exception to rulemaking verbatim, “it clearly doesn’t adopt the substantive interpretive language verbatim, which is right next door … in the APA. [read post]
In 2015, PG&E sought an extension of a lease from the State Lands Commission to continue operating the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant until 2025 when it is planned for decommission at the conclusion of its FERC-issued operating license term. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:12 pm by Katie Culliton
CalChamber members can sign up for the HRCalifornia Extra, a biweekly e-newsletter reporting on the latest labor laws and how they can affect your company. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:39 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
By introducing the TPR and the FSCR the UK Government has adopted a pragmatic approach to reducing the impact of a no deal Brexit on EEA firms. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
  Here’s one member’s question: On December 19, 2018, the SEC adopted final rules regarding the amendment of Regulation A. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:53 pm by Ben
In this light, I would like to get in the WIPO’s interpretation of the same. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:54 am by Katharina Schmid
Office fees for a filing in 3 classes were reduced to € 280,00 (e-filings, and € 300,00 for paper filings). [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:20 am by Juan C. Antúnez
[W]e agree with the daughters’ argument that the wife’s petition to determine her community property interest is a “claim” as that term is defined in section 731.201(4). [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 7:25 am
" Later that same day the Arbitrator issued another award, substantially the same but noting the suspension was for "for a first offense of Rules E-3 and E-5. [read post]