Search for: "BES v. State" Results 5081 - 5100 of 68,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am by Cyberleagle
It brings to mind the comment of Lord Scott in Rusbridger v Attorney-General, a case about the moribund Section 3 of the Treason Felony Act 1848:“[Y]ou do not have to be a very good lawyer to know that to advocate the abolition of the monarchy and its replacement by a republic by peaceful and constitutional means will lead neither to prosecution nor to conviction. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
 Following the principles endorsed by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Belton v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:21 am by Mark Walsh
None of this, as has been widely discussed, is being livestreamed, as oral arguments are now. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
But by 1787—when the Constitution was being written in Philadelphia—five of these states had abolished or begun to abolish slavery. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
These cases demonstrate clearly the change of position as compared with Allianz v West Tankers and Turner v Grovit, respectively. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:58 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
Argentum Exploration Limited v The Silver (All Persons Claiming to be Interested in and/or have Rights in Respect of, the Silver) v Secretary of State for Transport, The Receiver of Wreck [2022] EWCA Civ 1318 [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:48 am by Peter Mahler
” Examples featured on this blog include the decision by Justice Saliann Scarpulla (then a Manhattan Commercial Division judge, later elevated to the appellate bench) in Advanced 23, LLC v Chamber House Partners, LLC and retired Justice Charles Ramos’s decision in Goldstein v Pikus. [read post]