Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 31,284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2011, 4:34 pm
Such a claim was behind the New Mexico Supreme Court's decision in Provencio v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 10:12 pm
Gress v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 8:07 am
In Souratgar v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
True, they cannot be sentenced to death for any crime, Roper v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 3:30 am
Doug Berman raises the interesting question after the decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:45 am
See J.E.W. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 9:05 am
Some of the factors that the Family Court will consider include who was the primary nurturer of the child, the parenting skills of each of the parents, the physical and mental health of each of the parents, work schedules, family relationships, and, particularly if the child is older, the child’s preference. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 6:02 pm
Matter of N. v NY Office of Children & Family Services June 18, 2018 NY Slip Op 04379 Continue reading [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:27 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:33 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 11:00 pm
”Florida mode: activated.# # #DECISIONMatter of Nancy A. v Juan A. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
”As for the purported travel restrictions, the AD1 agreed that it was up to the State Department (not the courts) to remove any restrictions on his passport, so that the father could return to the United States.Apparently, his arguments didn’t travel well, either.# # #DECISIONVelin M. v Bermet T. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Best Interests of the Child and the Dublin System (C-648/11) (European Law Blog, Aug. 2013) [text] - EU Court of Justice ruling on MA & Others v UK (C-648/11). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 12:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 8:52 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Family Opinions Body: SC18934 - Barros v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
” While there is a presumption that access is appropriate, even when that parent is imprisoned, that assumed fact is rebuttable if it can be shown that the interaction would be “harmful to the child’s welfare or not in the child’s best interests. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:57 am
Burns v. [read post]
