Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 17,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2013, 12:05 pm
As discussed below, based on the new amendments, Canadian courts will have jurisdiction over defendants who are Canadian nationals regardless of where the illegal conduct occurred. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:22 pm
They would face too many lawsuits that cost too much money to defend. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Relatedly, a federal court in New Jersey found in favor of the plaintiff, Robert Scull, in his whistleblower lawsuit against The Wackenhut Corp. -- now G4S Secure Solutions -- alleging that he was terminated in retaliation for raising concerns about the company's monitoring of nuclear plants. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 1:55 am
However, the court accepted that the situation is different in the case of settlement agreements, where a defendant does not have the option of simply walking away if it does not believe the claimant’s statements. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:10 am
” The complaint goes on to argue that Congress violated the Due Process and Vesting Clauses by adjudicating Huawei a threat to national security outside of the courts and without providing the company an opportunity to defend itself. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 5:13 am
Security First Insurance Company, No. 4D14-424, the Court rejected all of the insurer's defenses, namely that a right which had not yet accrued cannot be assigned. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:23 pm
Zoom CEO Eric Yuan defended the decision to withhold strong encryption, saying, “Free users — for sure we don’t want to give [them] that, because we also want to work together with the FBI, with local law enforcement. [read post]
26 May 2018, 2:01 pm
And second, even if not, did SLUSA empower defendants to remove such actions from state to federal court? [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
Instead, if they choose to sue anyone at all for their personal injuries, it will probably be the local companies or officials who, through security lapses or other negligence, may have allowed the attacks to happen. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:38 pm
The order stated that the company violated the FCPA by, among other things, providing Chinese officials with meals, gifts, and entertainment in order to secure contracts and had hired relatives of Chinese officials that were deciding whether to select the company’s mobile technology products. [read post]
29 May 2010, 6:15 am
They are not only good in issues of litigation such as when you are being investigated for securities fraud by the Security and Exchange Commission or when a customer charges against you for product liability. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:15 am
While Shervin and defendant Joe Lonsdale control 78 percent of Hyperloop’s voting rights, the men are allegedly uninvolved in the company’s daily matters. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:28 am
How do you ensure that the settlement fully protects you or your company? [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:51 pm
The policies may give the appearance of security, but in reality, they contain little security for many claimants. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
The Defendant claimed to have material non-public information about a company that came from an insider. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
Can Chinese companies continue to get away with “shanzhai” — a Chinese term for prideful counterfeiting — of car designs? [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:37 pm
In Marchand, the background included the deaths of customers that had consumed the defendant company’s product. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 9:41 am
The Journal wrote today: While Apple's new efforts have drawn praise from some, the company has also received criticism. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 2:54 pm
” The complaint asserts claims against the director defendants for breach of fiduciary duty; aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty; abuse of control; unjust enrichment; and violation of the proxy provisions of the federal securities laws. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 6:13 pm
Morrison & Foerster partner James Bennett, defending the company and former three executives, clearly tried to humanize former CEO Jozef Strauss in the jury's eyes. [read post]
