Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 6,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2011, 3:47 am
Luxco, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
ANTI-GUNS-ON-CAMPUS BLOWBACK: You know, I raised this issue with a Faculty Senate colleague and was…
18 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm
Since the fall semester of 2006, state law has allowed licensed individuals to carry concealed handguns on the campuses of the nine degree-offering public colleges (20 campuses) and one public technical college (10 campuses) in Utah. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
Terra Sec v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:08 am
Societe Produits de Nestle S.A. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:17 pm
This agreement simplifies state tax systems, removes burdens to interstate commerce that are defined in the United States Supreme Court decision in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
The Credit Lyonnais factors are: (1) the importance of the documents requested to the litigation; (2) the degree of specificity of the request; (3) whether the information originated in the United States; (4) whether there are alternate means of getting the information; (5) the competing interests of the two states; (6) the hardship of compliance on the foreign party; and (7) the good faith of the party resisting discovery. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 11:30 pm
For example, R. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:20 am
In McPherson v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
H (2002) 1 FLR 1008 (United Kingdom -- Family Division -- 2002); see also Robertson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:20 pm
The Court went to Imperial Oil Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
” [via LexisOne] FAVORABLE TO THE PROSECUTION OR EXECUTIONER United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Supreme Court of United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V(1) states that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
Accordingly, the court concluded that prejudice must be presumed under United States v Cronic, 466 US 648; 104 S Ct 2039; 80 L Ed 2d 657 (1984). [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
In Cullen v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
" This court would hold Bidder B's feet to the fire.On the other hand, in MJ Paquet Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
Thus R. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:09 am
The Public Officers Law §3(1), provides that "[n]o person shall be capable of holding a civil office who shall not, at the time he [or she] shall be chosen thereto, . . . be a citizen of the United States, a resident of the state, and if it be a local office, a resident of the political subdivision or municipal corporation of the state for which he [or she] shall be chosen, or within which the electors electing him [or her] reside" (emphasis by the… [read post]
