Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 16,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2016, 4:35 pm
Are there any options if a parent does not want to vaccinate their child for the student to attend regular school? [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:12 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit on Wednesday struck down [Doe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:05 am
The current Guidelines for Examination require substantial amendments such that the description does not contradict the allowable claims (H-V, 2.7 and F-IV, 4.3(iii)). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 1:27 pm
However, if nonforfeiture compliance is under 54.7(a), then you have chosen to comply under 4221(n-1), and the statute does apply, and therefore these filing requirements do as well.Group Universal Life Insurance:The DFS filing guidance does not address group universal life insurance (GUL) at all. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 10:26 am
(It does not, however, provide standing for declaratory or injunctive relief.) [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:13 pm
Code §7071.17(h).) [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:10 pm
Does Wray replace McCabe? [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 11:00 am
What it does concentrate on is intellectual property. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Unlike Item 101(c)(1)(vii) of Regulation S-K, Item 101(h)(4)(vi) does not require a smaller reporting company to identify the name of any customer that accounts for 10% or more of its revenue. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 4:33 am
Ricci and Eleanor H. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
Does it matter if the recording is done openly or secretly? [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:16 am
Thus applying Central Hudson does not prevent the government from adopting all manner of rules designed to ensure consumers are not defrauded or unduly confused by commercial messages. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 1:55 pm
But “deference” does not mean that courts act as a rubber stamp for agency policies. . . . [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:49 am
Another problem with this sort of analysis, particularly when used to analyze the Court’s behavior over time, is that it does not account for shifts in the law. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm
Several of the parties questioned whether the House of Representatives had standing to intervene (and with good reason), but this does not matter for the Fifth Circuit to have jurisdiction both because the federal government is still enforcing the ACA and because (as the plaintiff states conceded), the state intervenors almost certainly have standing as well. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:26 pm
Justice Scalia gets plenty of things wrong, in my opinion, but he does not reflexively oppose the Obama Administration or vote to constrain regulatory agencies. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:26 pm
Does this matter? [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 7:16 pm
Further, there is empirical evidence that listing alone does little to help species, and that listing a species without providing funding for association recovery efforts may actually do more harm than good. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 5:15 pm
The Communications Act likely does not plainly authorize the Commission to resolve this signal question. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 9:35 pm
Google, famously, does not directly charge users. [read post]
