Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 11,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
In Estelle v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
The current position in English law may not be so simple. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:29 am
Lyle Denniston covered the argument for this blog, while I did the same in Plain English. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
In Walden v. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 12:53 pm
In Fu v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am
The first is Microsoft v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:53 pm
Becerra v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 6:05 pm
As`an even more belt and braces excuse, even draconian English libel law clearly allows for public interest privilege, ie, that sometimes there is a duty to say what you believe to be true for the benefit of the public, even though there may be legal dubiety as to its truth. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:52 am
So, as per SBP v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 2:21 am
This is an important question because it affects when the limitation period for the bringing of claims (which in English law for torts is normally six years) starts to run. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am
In summary, the dealing requirement is part of the ratio of OBG v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1 and no good or sufficient reason has been shown why the Court should depart from the relatively recent decision of the House of Lords in OBG in accordance with the 1966 Practice Statement. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
Comment The decision of the majority sits uneasily with the position as it would be for other English citizens ordinarily resident in Northern Ireland, who seek treatment through the NHS for other illnesses. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 1:45 am
The proceedings have been brought by the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) under the Financial Markets Test Case Scheme (the “Scheme”) pursuant to an agreement made with eight insurance companies to resolve issues of general importance on which immediately relevant and authoritative English law guidance is needed. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Mr Saini QC for the appellant attempted to argue a hypothetical point that were the appellant’s wife English as opposed to French, he would not have been detained, and that therefore the appellant’s wife’s freedom of movement was being compromised. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
In Mendoza v Silva, 2013 WL 6491479 (N.D.Iowa) Plaintiff Maria Guadalupe Aguilar Mendoza, a citizen of Mexico, filed an action to secure the return of her daughters, five-year-old K.G.M.A. and four-year-old M.K.M.A.. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:05 am
For example, thedecision of the House of Lords in White v White [2001] 1 AC 596was adopted by the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong in LKW v DD [2010] HKFLR 016, enshrining the principle of ‘equal sharing’ of matrimonial assets in a shift from previous needs-based approach per C v C which had historically simply provided wives on divorce with enough to meet their reasonable requirements. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Saleh Mizyed v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Saleh Mizyed v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am
The Supreme Court found that English law governed. [read post]
