Search for: "Greene v. State" Results 5081 - 5100 of 6,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2025, 5:43 am by admin
  The Supreme Court confirmed this understanding of constructive discharge in Green v. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm by Lesley Wexler
Absent checks from the legislature or the judiciary, are there alternate policies that support a norm of inclusion, but address the stated or potentially legitimate rationales for such changes? [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Commentary magazine has published the responses they received from a wide variety of writers and broadcasters to the question ‘is free speech under threat in the United States? [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Third IP cross-retaliation strike against USA at WTO (Excess Copyright) World Economic Forum survey: US 18th in global IP protection (Intellectual Property Watch) Funds for US State Department global IP enforcement training (Intellectual Property Watch) Changes in USPTO senior management (Patent Docs)   US Patents PatentFreedom to offer subscription-based reexam service to attack NPE patents (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Amelia Womack, the deputy leader of the Green Party, has complained to IPSO about the front page story, along with around 300 other people. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 1:17 am by Adam Wagner
The FCO also referred to another prisoner voting case, Frodl v Austria (see my post), which “in the Government’s view, is inconsistent with Hirst”. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:55 am by J. Gordon Hylton
  Moreover, as I noted several years ago in an article on the landmark right of publicity case of Uhleander v. [read post]