Search for: "In Re Doe I" Results 5081 - 5100 of 70,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2013, 6:26 am
Can you watch — and by "you," I mean only those who have loved Obama — and not talk back? [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:12 am by Staci Zaretsky
Where does your school stand now? [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 3:34 am by Jack Bogdanski
Are there other polls that I'm missing? [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:03 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Juvenile Law Opinions Body: SC19372 Order on Motion - In re Yasiel R. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 11:30 pm by Jack Bogdanski
Gosh, does it get any more slanted than that? [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
The videos of the presentations from this event are now available.Even though this event comes from the open source software community and does not directly relate to technical services, or even libraries, I think it is a valuable interdisciplinary learning opportunity for technical services law librarians. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 11:36 pm by Jack Bogdanski
"The move includes the approval of emergency contract awards to speed up funding distribution after the board voted to allocate $50 million in unanticipated Supportive Housing Services revenue and $12 million in federal COVID-19 funds....Vega Pederson announced she will also expand emergency housing and legal services to prevent evictions — including emergency rental assistance.And of course, nothing this person does can be done without a blast from her word salad… [read post]
30 May 2017, 12:22 pm
The least expensive plan I could find ran a little over $900,with a $6500 deductible, and a max out of pocket of just over $14,000.So they could spend an additional $1,200 for a plan with 40% higher exposure.On the other hand, it does cover birth control.Oh, and they should feel **too** awful about that 15% rate hike. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 4:43 am by SHG
I’m really tired of reading how business owners are “forced” to layoff workers. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:09 pm
My quick take: the mark does seem, at a minimum, deceptively misdescriptive - despite the cleverness of the name, I'd assume it contained some sort of reprocessed peat; "re" is not a transparent prefix the way "mock" or "faux" or "imitation" might be. [read post]