Search for: "In re JOHNSON"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 5,409
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
See Alappat, 33 F.3d at 1542, 31 USPQ2d at 1556; see also In re Johnson, 502 F.2d 765, 183 USPQ 172 (CCPA 1974) (Rich, J., dissenting).(...)Footnote 6. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
“At the end of the day, I don’t know if I got a fair price, or what they’re charging me,” Mr. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:47 am
If there were logical comparability, this court’s decisions would have recognized it in the Johnson factors or in past lodestar decisions. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm
This year that lecture will be delivered by Jakob Kellenberger, President of the International Committee of the Red Cross – and, we're pleased to note, IntLawGrrls contributor Leila Nadya Sadat will serve as discussant.Also of note is the annual WILIG luncheon, on Thursday, March 29. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
If you like voting cases (if, say, your name is Rick), well, you’re in luck. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm
Jennifer Johnson and Edward Brunet sharply criticized proposals to change that rule in their article Arbitration of Shareholder Claims: Why Change is Not Always a Measure of Progress: Two Blue Ribbon business advisory panels have recently proposed arbitration to remedy the problems endemic to shareholder class action litigation. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm
Research and Resources Privacy Varieties of Damages for Breach of Privacy, J N E Varuhas [2018] UMelbLRS 7 Data Protection Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018, Nic Newman, Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, David Levy and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, University of Oxford – Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism A Right to Reasonable Inferences: Re-Thinking Data Protection Law in the Age of Big Data and AI, Sandra Wachter and Brent Mittelstadt,… [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:34 am
She was re-elected for a second term in 2014. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Members of Congress sent letters to Secretary of State John Kerry and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Jeh Johnson on October 15 calling for such action. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 4:46 pm
7-3-2008 National:The other day, I had a discussion of the politics of fear with Doug Thomas (USC), Carrie James (Harvard), and Larry Johnson (The New Media Consortium) as part of a gathering of MacArthur foundation grantees working on their Youth and Digital Learning Initiative. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 3:37 pm
function PopupPic(sPicURL, sHeight, sWidth) { window.open( "http://media.star-telegram.com/popup.html? [read post]
27 Dec 2024, 11:39 am
The court disregards any precedential effect of that event because the Eagle Mountain ruling took place in the intervening years and thus should have emboldened Kiffin about his fair use rights: “a reasonable person in Kiffin’s position who cared to research the issue would have concluded that he had every legal right to re-tweet the WIN Passage, at least in this circuit. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:47 am
Bloomberg News reports that Barclay’s analyst Brian Johnson predicts that GM “will probably create a fund of as much as $3 billion to pay claims associated with” the ignition problems. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0486p.06 2007/12/17 USA v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 3:25 pm
Comparison of similar crimes leaves you wondering: Why is Gaile Owens facing execution? [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:24 am
Iowa – Cruz Edges Trump in Iowa Caucuses; Rubio Finishes Strong ThirdWashington Post – Philip Rucker and Jenna Johnson | Published: 2/1/2016 U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 5:06 pm
The first is Johnson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:21 pm
There were fascinating points were raised by Nick Johnson from Warwick when talking about the Warwick Law School scenario. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
But some fraud on the FDA claims can’t be “preempted” because they’re not subject to the Supremacy Clause from which the preemption doctrine flows. [read post]
