Search for: "In re R. F." Results 5081 - 5100 of 10,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2009, 3:30 pm
  "[I]f we make arrests or issue citations," he said, "we're taking them to the court. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 11:51 am by Juan C. Antúnez
If you don’t have a sense of humor, you’re not going to last very long in private practice — especially as a litigator. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:16 pm
Nous ferons ici référence au Règlement d’Arbitrage du Centre de Conciliation et d’Arbitrage de Panama, dans la Section IV, qui établit ce qui suit : SECTION IV. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 7:03 am
., In re Kuhle, 526 F.2d 553, 555, 188 USPQ 7, 8-9 (CCPA 1975) (holding that the claimed manner in which an electrical contact was made, i.e. by "metallic wrapping," that provided no novel or unexpected result over the metallic connections used in the applied references was an obvious choice within the skill of the art) (cited with approval in In re Chu, 66 F.3d 292, 299, 36 USPQ2d 1089, 1094 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:33 pm
., In re May, 574 F.2d 1082, 1094, (CCPA 1978) and In re Schechter, 205 F.2d 185, 191, (CCPA 1953).)Finally, the Applicant used these differences to rebut the Examiner's substitution rationale:The Examiner is arguing that the respective methods of treating chronic pain by blocking the neuron are similar to blocking a receptor that activates a muscle by means of a neuron that provides a neurotransmitter such as acetylcholine. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
., In re May, 574 F.2d 1082, 1094, (CCPA 1978) and In re Schechter, 205 F.2d 185, 191, (CCPA 1953).)Finally, the Applicant used these differences to rebut the Examiner's substitution rationale:The Examiner is arguing that the respective methods of treating chronic pain by blocking the neuron are similar to blocking a receptor that activates a muscle by means of a neuron that provides a neurotransmitter such as acetylcholine. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 5:44 am
In re Jung, 637 F.3d 1356, 1365 (Fed.Cir.2011), quoting In re Kronig, 539 F.2d 1300, 1302-03 (CCPA 1976). [read post]
Dans les résidences privées, les personnes ne doivent pas se réunir en groupes de plus de 10 personnes, et il est préférable que le rassemblement soit limité à des personnes provenant de seulement 3 maisons distinctes. [read post]