Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 7,891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 1:24 pm
The operative part of the Keystone XL amendment (SA 1537), offered by Senator John Hoeven (R-ND) indicates, "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no permit pursuant to Executive Order 13337 (3 U.S.C. 301 note) or any other similar Executive Order regulating construction, connection, operation, or maintenance of facilities at the borders of the United States, and no additional environmental impact statement, shall be required for TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L.P. to… [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:00 pm
Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber In the limited time and space, may I offer to following observations for Panel 2: (1) The S395 and HJ (Iran) cases are truly landmark cases. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
by NYU Journal of International Law and Politics Panel 2 of the NYU JILP Vol. 44:2 Online Symposium John Tobin is an Associate Professor at Melbourne Law School where he teaches and researches in the area of human rights. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
by NYU Journal of International Law and Politics Panel 2 of the NYU JILP Vol. 44:2 Online Symposium Bojana Asanovic is a barrister at Lamb Building, Chambers of Ami Feder in London. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
Without knowing each side’s position in those negotiations, I’m not in a position to judge who was acting unreasonably. (2) The Kochs made a huge error in nominating some directors without strong libertarian credentials (Hinderaker, Olson), and others with direct ties to the Kochs (including Olson, who does legal work for them). [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
by NYU Journal of International Law and Politics Panel 1 of the NYU JILP Vol. 44:2 Online Symposium Lucy Yeatman is a lecturer in law at the University of Greenwich, teaching Family Law and Human Rights Law. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
Sec’y of State for the Home Dep’t (HJ and HT), [2010] UKSC 31, [3], [2011] 1 A.C. 596, 619–20 (appeal taken from Eng. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
by NYU Journal of International Law and Politics Panel 1 of the NYU JILP Vol. 44:2 Online Symposium David John Frank is Professor of Sociology and, by courtesy, Education at the University of California, Irvine. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:01 am
Of course, this is not true with regard to limited partners. 3. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:47 am
Until a few days ago, if one who was board certified used that title in any letterhead or ad, the following disclaimer was necessary: ""[1] The [name of the private certifying organization] is not affiliated with any governmental authority [,] [2] Certification is not a requirement for the practice of law in the State of New York and [3] does not necessarily indicate greater competence than other attorneys experience in this field of law. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:39 pm
That figure does not include the national [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:14 am
Zalta (ed.); see also the Wikipedia entry on Justifications for copyright. 2. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:23 am
Michigan Court Rule 7.103(A)(1). [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
This theory embraces the view that expressive works are the extension of one’s self and thus are deserving of protection because of an individual’s inherent dignity.2 The final theory owes its origins primarily to the work of Enlightenment philosopher John Locke. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
1. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 4:10 am
Texas judicial administrators estimate that 1 in every 3 dollars raised through such state fees is spent on projects outside the court system — a practice critics say amounts to an undeclared tax on the state's poor that might violate the law. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:36 pm
John J. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:45 am
Motion for leave to file and amicus brief of Tarrant Regional Water District Amicus brief of Upper Trinity Regional Water District Reply of petitioners John Doe AP v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:10 am
" That phrase "future customer" does not appear in the original opinion. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 3:29 am
" Second, the Board found the mark merely descriptive of Applicant's services under Section(2)(e)(1). [read post]
