Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 8,219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2016, 5:57 am
The law was, the DMA argued, a clever way to avoid the holding in Quill v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
Hodges y United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:53 am
It's a 5-4 decision, thus leaving the rights protected by our Constitution in the hands of a single individual, Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose individual views more than any other dictate the fundamental law of the United States of America. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:00 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided to consider Timbs v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
Kennedy and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm
It concerns the respect that federal courts owe the States and the States' procedural rules when reviewing the claims of state prisoners in federal habeas corpus.Coleman's lawyer blew a deadline in the Virginia Supreme Court, and as a result, O'Connor (joined by Rehnquist, White, Scalia, Kennedy, and Souter) determined that Coleman had forfeited his right to have federal courts review his federal constitutional claims. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:29 pm
The oral argument in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
In Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:18 am
Nevertheless, as in a 1993 case (Sale v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 11:41 am
The Supreme Court heard argument in Bilski v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
In his release, Kennedy correctly stated the basic common sense principle that, “Inherent in our nation’s right to religious freedom is a promise that my belief cannot be used to infringe on yours or do you harm. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 2:55 pm
The new decision, in the case of Cooper v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm
Ellerth, and Faragher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
MercExchange in 2006 and KSR v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp and Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:14 am
” To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence'” (Bells v Foster, 83 AD3d at 877, quoting Kennedy v H. [read post]
