Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 6,603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2011, 6:24 pm
Citing Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:58 am
While Elk Ridge’s Warranty Deed does not specifically list and exclude the Master Plan, it more generally states that the deed is “SUBJECT TO reservations and restrictions contained in the United States patents or other matters of public record, to easements and rights-of-way of record or in use and to prior mineral reservations of record. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:50 am
Gore, Citizens United, and numerous other cases to see that our highest court in the land does not mete out “Equal Justice Under Law. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
For the sovereign immunity argument, the State cited to the Supreme Court of the United States’ decision in Alden v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
For the sovereign immunity argument, the State cited to the Supreme Court of the United States’ decision in Alden v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:45 am
The District Court believed that 'overall control' was decisive, and that the United Nations had such control at all relevant times. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Defendants in Iraq oil for food case failed with appeal that criminal offences created by Government pursuant to s.1 United Nations Act 1946 were ultra vires because they were not created “promptly” Patmalneice v SOS Work & Pensions [2011] [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Constitutional meaning is hotly contested in the United States today. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:49 pm
Meanwhile, Goebel's seminar continued to study the development of the corporation in England and the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:32 pm
Plaintiffs (eight states, a city, and three land trusts) brought federal common law public nuisance claims seeking injunctive relief against five of the largest carbon emitters in the United States (four private power companies and the federal Tennessee Valley Authority). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:32 pm
Plaintiffs (eight states, a city, and three land trusts) brought federal common law public nuisance claims seeking injunctive relief against five of the largest carbon emitters in the United States (four private power companies and the federal Tennessee Valley Authority). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:32 pm
Plaintiffs (eight states, a city, and three land trusts) brought federal common law public nuisance claims seeking injunctive relief against five of the largest carbon emitters in the United States (four private power companies and the federal Tennessee Valley Authority). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:45 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
In fact, the United States Fifth Circuit previously determined that the same exact gambling boat, the M/V Crown, was not a vessel. [read post]
