Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 5,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2010, 2:31 am
Crazy Troll c/o CrazyTroll.com, FA0602000651676 (Nat. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
" Statement of City Council Speaker Christine C. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm
District Judge Irene C. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
District Judge Irene C. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:05 am
This might have been the concern in the past but it misses the mark today. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:21 am
Some arguments have nowhere to go, Alexis C. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
” The Federalist No. 43, p. 272 (C. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:57 am
WhenU.com, Inc., 414 F.3d 400 (2d Cir. 2005), which held that no Lanham Act "use", and, thus, no actionable Lanham Act claim, exists for the use of a trademark in a keyword or metatag, where (a) the defendant does not place the trademark on any product, good or service, (b) it is not used in any way that would indicate source of origin, and (c) where defendant's use of plaintiff's trademark is strictly internal and not communicated to the public, as the use does… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:04 pm
Similarly, I was hoping to discuss the implications of 47 USC 230(c)(2), the immunization for filtering technologies, but where does that fit in? [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:48 am
The welcome mat marks my territory In making that choice, what have they renounced? [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:21 am
Taking advantage of the recognition that a complainant has created for its mark is not a bona fide offering of goods or services, but there has to be proof of targeting not simply an allegation, Target Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm
Entertainment did not show that the parties’ marks are similar; The parties do not compete with respect to the same goods or services; E! [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:25 am
"Taking nutrients just makes good sense. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:25 am
"Taking nutrients just makes good sense. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
This appears for example at paragraph 67 of the judgment of Sir Mark Potter P in Charman v Charman [2007] 1 FLR 1246 (Charman (No 4)) where he says:“… the starting point of every inquiry in an application of ancillary relief is the financial position of the parties. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:43 am
For registrants who regularly engage in the business of registering and reselling domain names, and/or using them to display advertising links, they must show that – It makes good faith efforts to avoid registering and using domain names that are identical or confusingly similar to marks held by others; – The domain name in question is a dictionary word or a generic or descriptive phrase; – The domain name is not identical or confusingly similar to a famous or… [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm
Never underestimate the value of a good domain name! [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 10:50 am
Merpel's not so sure: she still wonders about the European Court of Justice references in Case C-283/01 Shield Mark and Case C-273/00 Sieckmann, where the principal actors were IP practitioners themselves. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 3:22 pm
Copyright © 2009 Mark Bennett. [read post]
