Search for: "People v. Case" Results 5081 - 5100 of 51,345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2014, 2:31 pm
 But the district court (correctly) viewed this case as a close one, and one that related to an important workplace issue that might affect lots of people even though it was not a class action. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
  Well, the plaintiff in this case helps you hunt other people...with paintballs instead of bullets. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Florian Mueller
They employed FUD tactics before (during the district court trial and after Oracle appealed), misleading some people to believe that anyone using an API to write apps for a platform would have to worry, which was never the issue. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 12:01 pm
 About the only people who benefit are the plaintiffs' attorneys, since it's a Section 1983 case and they get their fees paid if they win. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 9:28 am by Dean Freeman
That was the situation in the recent Nebraska Supreme Court case of Grammer v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am by Patricia Hughes
(Emphasis in original) (para. 76) (Justice Sharma reviews the freedom of expression jurisprudence extensively and distinguishes two cases, Walker v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 3:46 pm
  The court held that plaintiffs seeking class certification in a securities fraud case may not invoke the Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 9:30 am
Aug. 31, 2009), thus follows a long and growing line of cases which simply hold that where there is no actual harm, there can be no case. [read post]