Search for: "Powers v. Thomas"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 5,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm
Another early use of the phrase "public reason" is found in Thomas Jefferson's Second Inaugural Address: [I]t is proper that you should understand what I deem the essential principles of our government, and consequently those which ought to shape its administration . . . . [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 5:59 pm
Put another way, the fact that the OFCCP “did not make use of its full panoply of powers with the earlier regulations” does not mean those powers were forfeited, the court said. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
The lawyers point out that the Authorization for the Use of Military Force in Afghanistan, passed in 2001, says nothing explicit about detention powers, and that the Supreme Court, in cases such as Hamdi v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:41 am
He is thug and power hungry sycophant. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Kammen invoked Witherspoon v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
It accepts that the different policy goal, articulated in the Supreme Court’s Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am
But to date only Justice Thomas has indicated an interest in revisiting the Court’s immunity decisions. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/c4h Kolev v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
L.J. 1033 (2009); Thomas R. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
W and B v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 8:34 am
In Tennessee v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am
As soon as you start saying it’s private party v. private party, must go to Article III. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas, however, argued in his concurrence that the Court should reconsider longstanding substantive due process rulings, including Griswold v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Second Circuit in SEC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
See California v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
[A belated update on my accomplishments in 2020.] [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Dawes off the hook (kinda) – the reformers in power in DC stripped Indians of their property rights without tribal consent (the cases of Lone Wolf v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Justice THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
