Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State" Results 5081 - 5100 of 5,844
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:22 am by Jay Willis
Liptak notes that the Court's 2002 decision in Atkins v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:59 am
Drink and drugs were the main preoccupation of some of Europe's finest legal brains this morning, when the Court of First Instance rendered its decision in Case Tâ€'234/06, Giampietro Torresan v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Klosterbrauerei Weissenohe GmbH & Co. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
After rejecting Pirate's contention that the "actual malice" standard from New York Times Co. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:15 am
"But we can hardly afford either the bad publicity or the litigation in this economy. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
Shell Oil Products Co., Dkt. 08-240, and Shell Oil Products Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:49 am
Arce, 34 Fed.Appx. 879, n. 4 (4th Cir., 2002)(not selected for publication); Green v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
; Commercial success as criterion of inventive step: Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & co. [read post]