Search for: "Reach v. State" Results 5081 - 5100 of 36,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2008, 2:50 pm
The ruling hinged on the "degree of control" exercised by the newspaper over the carrier, with the court finding that the T&G exercised greater control than did the Athol Daily News in a 2003 case in which the Supreme Judicial Court reached the opposite conclusion.The court's opinion: Driscoll v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 10:23 am by Beth Graham
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:17 am by Eric Goldman
Is this an indicator that state appellate judges will become activist to reach what they consider just results? [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
  Sounds like BS, but the merits were never reached. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:01 pm by Miriam Seifter
In today’s opinion in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am by Rosalind Earis, 6KBW
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:29 am by Lisa Kömives
Greenaway of the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit wrote in the opinion that in Daubert v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm by Donald Thompson
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for such procedure. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
Kornowicz's "spouse" despite repeated requests from the school district, leading to this lawsuit, Kornowicz & Higgins v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 4:47 pm by CoL .net
Articles 1, 2, and 4 are provisions that positively state the scope of recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments in the two regions; Articles 3, 5, 12, and 13 are provisions that clearly recognize and enforce the scope of civil and commercial judgments of the courts of the two regions. [read post]