Search for: "See v. See" Results 5081 - 5100 of 122,062
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2023, 1:24 am by Public Employment Law Press
Substantial evidence is "a minimal standard that requires less than a preponderance of the evidence and demands only the existence of a rational basis in the record as a whole to support the findings upon which the determination is based" (see Matter of Blamah v New York Off. of the State Comptroller, 207 AD3d 905. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 8:16 am by cable&clark
As Justice Potter Stewart said in the 1964 case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:25 pm
While we wait for the Supreme Court to decide Giles, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:36 am
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals issued its opinion in Giant v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:06 pm by JT
As Assignee of Raul Rodriguez v Country-wide Ins. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:03 am by snahmod
The government speech doctrine began in the Supreme Court with Rust v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 10:16 am
In amidst the 236 pages (288 with the appendix) of issues covered by Judge Jack Weinstein in US v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:44 pm by Rick Hasen
If Justice Stevens saw fit to tie Bush v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:47 am by Steve Bainbridge
Josh Fershee recently flagged an Illinois case in which the court invoked veil piercing in a criminal case: See People v. [read post]