Search for: "See v. See" Results 5081 - 5100 of 122,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"An allegedly defamatory statement is subject to a qualified privilege when it is fairly made by a person in the discharge of some public or private duty, legal or moral, or in the conduct of his [or her] own affairs, in a matter where his [or her] interest is concerned", citing Braunstein v Day, 195 AD3d at 589-590 [internal quotation marks omitted]", see Stega v New York Downtown Hosp., 31 NY3d 661; and 2. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"An allegedly defamatory statement is subject to a qualified privilege when it is fairly made by a person in the discharge of some public or private duty, legal or moral, or in the conduct of his [or her] own affairs, in a matter where his [or her] interest is concerned", citing Braunstein v Day, 195 AD3d at 589-590 [internal quotation marks omitted]", see Stega v New York Downtown Hosp., 31 NY3d 661; and 2. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 3:40 am by Dan Filler
The use of defamation as a means of policing false statements, even in the area of political speech (see g., Dominion Voting Systems v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:02 am by Josh Blackman
In an alternate reality, Justice Garland would be on the Supreme Court, Roe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 5:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We affirm, albeit on a ground different than that relied upon by the court (see Green v Conciatori, 26 AD3d 410, 410). [read post]