Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 5081 - 5100
of 13,582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2010, 6:39 pm
In fact, the Child Support Guidelines includes, but is not limited to 23 possibilities for income, as follows: a. compensation for services, including wages, fees, tips, and commissions; b. the operation of a business minus ordinary and necessary operating expenses (see IRS Schedule C); c. gains derived from dealings in property; d. interest and dividends (see IRS Schedule B); e. rents (minus ordinary and necessary expenses - see IRS Schedule E); f. bonuses and royalties;… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Obi Umesi)............25Pet'r's Brief, Baze v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:05 pm
JANIS, GREER C. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
[see Section 3020-a 3. c. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
A change in course does not end a case where a plaintiff seeks damages for past wrongs, but where, as in Trump v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 2:02 pm
The case of Greater Bombay Co-Op Bank Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 9:36 am
On September 9, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued an opinion in Thabault v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
A former general counsel of a diagnostic lab, who participated in a qui tam action, violated his ethical obligations under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, ruled the Second Circuit (United States of America v Quest Diagnostics, Inc, October 25, 2013, Cabranes, J). [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 1:12 pm
State Action in Food and Controlled Substances Regulation and the Benefits of Friction Between Regulatory Authorities Diana R. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
Inst. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm
C-48-CV-2019-11724 (C.P. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 5:21 pm
”[14] In United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:21 am
’ Rawlings v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:44 am
Judge Randolf, writing for the Court, concentrated most of his opinion on employer "free speech" rights, stating that Section 8(c) of the Act protects not just an employer's right to state its opinion on whether its employees should unionize, but also protects "the right of employers (and unions) not to speak." [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
Mitchell, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Islington (2020) EWHC 1478 (Admin) Where a local authority has an initial s.188 Housing Act 1996 duty to provide interim accommodation, but then makes a s.184 decision that the applicant is not in priority need, is that sufficient to bring the s.188 duty to an end? [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:46 pm
C. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Justice Byron R. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 2:06 pm
Last week, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:30 am
Oh., Feb. 11, 2014) claims her hourly wage equaled approximately $2.85, while the plaintiff in Krystal C. v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 11:38 am
This issue went to the Court of Appeal in A, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2008] EWCA Civ 1445, which found no breach of Art 6. [read post]
