Search for: "State v. Force"
Results 5081 - 5100
of 32,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am
The reason for this excitement was that the ECJ said that art.20, of the Treaty, required member states to grant a right of residence to a third country national, who was the primary carer of an EU national, if a refusal to would result in the EU national being forced to leave the EU..More excitingly, this applied to EU nationals who had not left their member state, i.e. it would apply to the parents of British nationals.This, everyone presumed, would mean that not… [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
The matter arose in Norfolk County Retirement System v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:07 am
State aid to religious schools clearly violates the separation of church and state.Herx’s unfortunate situation shows exactly why taxpayers should not be forced to pay for religious school tuition. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
See paras 23 – 29 of R (English UK Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1726 for a further explanation of the workings of PBS. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Bauman, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 5:31 am
Follow the process of the still ongoing ConnectU v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:27 pm
Today’s opinion in Howell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 6:03 pm
iStock From Thursday’s Bridgeville Rifle & Pistol Club v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:22 pm
The Georgia decision (formally captioned The State of Georgia v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 3:09 pm
In State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 3:09 pm
In State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
Subscript offers a graphic explainer for Currier v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:20 am
On March 20, 2009, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey decided the case of Wade v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:22 am
In the case, Hughes v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:53 am
By way of background, the FAAAA expressly preempts any state “law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of any motor carrier . . with respect to the transportation of property. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
The courts ultimately said “no,” see Abigail Alliance v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 12:15 am
Dixon v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:04 pm
The states argue that individuals cannot be forced to buy insurance, something the individual may not need or want. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark case Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
