Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 5081 - 5100 of 10,392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2015, 10:30 am by Brian Denney
Trial by Jury is one of the most important rights we have as citizens of the United States of America. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:52 am by Paul Stephan
President Truman’s initial decision not to recognize the sovereignty of any state over Jerusalem seems much more clearly within the nexus of attributes covered by recognition than, say, the claims settlement mechanism memorialized in the Litvinov Assignment that United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:28 am
In the five years after the Court invalidated the Gun-Free School Zones Act for exceeding the scope of the federal Commerce Power in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, was “something of an anticlimax. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:50 am by Mark Walsh
“But when they organized our government, the people of the United States had other ideas. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am by Lyle Denniston
United States), and will clarify the standard for summoning a special three-judge U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
Said the Court, the high rating position of links to the CTM proprietor’s website could be justified in the light of the earlier mark’s well-known character in the United States; they did not show that EU consumers were familiar with the earlier mark, given that no evidence was provided of its market share, of how intensive, geographically widespread and long-standing its use was, of the investment in its promotion and of how significant a… [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:54 am
To recap briefly, the document was a secret court order issued under Section 215 of the Patriot Act directing Verizon to provide "on an ongoing daily basis" all call records for any call "wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls" and any call made "between the United States and abroad. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:25 pm by Nikki Siesel
If you would like a courtesy consultation before filing a trademark application with the United States Patent & Trademark Office, kindly contact our office. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by Terry Hart
“Without this legislation, the existence of the broadcast news monitoring industry in the United States is and will remain in jeopardy. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
Today marks the 87th anniversary of the landmark Olmstead v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm
Our long-term goals are ambitious—the end of overbroad surveillance of all digital communications, a recognition of the privacy rights of people outside the United States, and strong accountability and oversight for surveillance practices. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
In the closing days of the recently concluded May term, the Illinois Supreme Court handed down its decision in Marks v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
United States, reversing a Pennsylvania man’s conviction for making threats on Facebook. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 5:32 am by SHG
The United States Supreme Court issues its long-awaited decision in Elonis v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:49 am by NCC Staff
The committee said it was clear, to it, that “the 14th amendment to the Constitution has no effect whatever upon the status of the Indian tribes within the limits of the United States,” but that “straggling Indians” were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]