Search for: "mark" Results 5081 - 5100 of 135,683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2006, 7:36 am
Third: Assume that status is merely relative, and that any one mark is equal to any other mark, so long as the marks carry equivalent status. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:37 am by Glenn Reynolds
SO ON THE PLANE BACK HOME I read an advance copy of Mark Levin’s Ameritopia: The Unmaking of America. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:35 pm by Evan Anderson
  If unassisted or ill-informed, a brand owner with a less than competent handle on trademark law can make decisions that later with have serious implications with respect to the registerability or enforceability of a trademark that while registered is still an extremely weak mark. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:18 am by David Oscar Markus
(L to R) Mark Royero (2L); Adam Stolz (coach); Kaitlin Prece (2L); not pictured: Luis Reyes (coach) The Supreme Court of the United States can agree on something: In McElrath v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 4:49 am
The Big Three in Chicago, 2007TTABlog update: Ron Coleman at his Likelihood of Confusion blog, gives me some grief here regarding the MEET THE BLOGGERS "mark. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 2:01 pm by Bob Ambrogi
To learn more, I speak with a principal of the new practice, Mark Ross, who joined Deloitte in January after serving as executive vice president and global head of contracts, compliance and commercial services at the global ALSP Integreon. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:41 am
          Trade mark used to deceive consumers. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 3:27 am by Ken Chan
HP also disclosed Mark Hurd’s Separation Agreement and Release. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:20 am by Virginia Hunt
 Mark Kabins, M.D. spoke to a small group of claimants’ attorneys last week to  talk about treatment of work-related spinal injuries. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 11:23 am
Mark's post raises interesting food for thought regarding the issue of the re-casting and/or re-pricing of options, post-complaint. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
The Board found two major problems with this evidence: (1) there was no proof as to whether these marks are in use or whether the public is familiar with them; and (2) none of the marks are as similar to the registered marks as is the applied-for mark. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 3:17 am
Opposer Altadis failed to prove that its design marks are famous, but the Board deemed them to be strong marks entitled to a broad scope of protection.The Board found that applicant's mark "incorporates the entirety of one of Opposer's marks. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 4:03 am by John L. Welch
The marks in the third-party references cited by applicant differ in connotation, appearance, and sound from the two marks at issue here. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 3:41 am
" We do not ignore the design elements in the marks unique to each mark, particularly Applicant’s use of devil horns and tail and Opposer’s mark appearing to be a three-pronged claw mark. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:10 am by Dennis Crouch
Especially those companies that had previously marked some of their products but had stopped due to the recent plague of costly mass-marking-trolls-litigation, now ended by the AIA. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 7:24 am by Eleonora Rosati
If you are interested in trade mark law developments, you cannot miss the classic Retromark update. [read post]