Search for: "Best v. Best" Results 5101 - 5120 of 37,372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2022, 8:38 am by Race to the Bottom
Even the Chamber of Digital Commerce notes in its amicus brief for SEC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 5:03 pm by Morris Turek
  Burck, who is best known for strumming his guitar on the sidewalks of Times Square wearing only boots, a 10 gallon hat, and tighty-whities, has been using the name NAKED COWBOY since at least as early as 1998 in connection with his entertainment services. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm by Eric Goldman
” The text included the following: As part of our ongoing efforts to provide the best service to learners, customers, and partners, we will be updating some of our policies. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Crookes v Newton 2011 SCC 47, written up here for Inforrm by Paul Schabas and Jon Goheen, has been hailed as a victory for free speech online. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
The Best Patent Book: Patent Pledges Global Perspectives on Patent Law's Private Ordering Frontier. [read post]
2 May 2019, 1:08 pm by Anthony Carbone, PC
Plaintiffs Both Had Bills from Car Accidents The court consolidated two cases in deciding the appeal of Haines v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 12:06 pm
Copyright Infringement (8/25) Everything Old is New Again, in Bb (8/30) Calling Elvis's Ringtone (which features the best case summary EVAR!) [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 12:55 pm by Eric Goldman
Even reverse chronological order is an editorial choice about the best way to present content to the service’s audience. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
Analysis On its own this decision once again concludes the arguments about postponement of confiscation proceedings, but it should be read in the light of the decisions in R v Waya [2012] UIKSC 51, R v Ahmad, R v Fields [2014] UKSC 36 and R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:21 am by Curt Cutting
Johnson & Johnson has filed a petition for review with the California Supreme Court in Johnson & Johnson v. [read post]