Search for: "Best v. State Bar"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 5,424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2008, 1:39 pm
At one point, the Court adopted a solution whereby it would announce a new rule in one case but then not apply that rule to cases pending on direct review in which the relevant events (typically a state-court conviction) occurred before the law-changing decision.24 But in Harper v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 8:05 pm
Looking at United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:07 pm
(This was the exact issue in Morrissey v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:09 am
At one point, the Court adopted a solution whereby it would announce a new rule in one case but then not apply that rule to cases pending on direct review in which the relevant events (typically a state-court conviction) occurred before the law-changing decision.24 But in Harper v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 10:56 am
In Stockman Bank of Montana v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 3:02 am
” Possible solutions: According to the American Bar Association (ABA), 18 states now require corroboration of an accomplice’s statements. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:58 pm
The latest on this topic comes from a post I made on the gazillionth backup thread I’ve been involved with on various law practice management listserves (in this case from the State Bar of Wisconsin’s Practice411 list), as follows in a thread where a small firm lawyer asked: “What is the best computer backup system and why? [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:32 am
But in Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
" Indiana: State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
In a ruling by a magistrate judge, the United States District Court for the District of Maine has concluded that MetLife v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 7:27 pm
See Adkins v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:23 pm
— would not bar his designation as an enemy combatant subject to detention, and would not bar some relaxation of normal procedural safeguards. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:30 pm
Sacks, P.C. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v… [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 8:06 am
HOMEOWNERS - FIRE LOSS - 2-YEAR CONTRACTUAL SUIT LIMITATIONS PERIOD - WAIVER - ESTOPPEL - BAD FAITHVan Acker v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:37 pm
Co. a/s/o Raymon Morgan v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:09 pm
The greatest and best-used example of "Brady material" is impeachment statements by a prosecution witness (US v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
Germany's ban extends only to prisoners whose crimes target the integrity of the state or the democratic order, such as political insurgents. [read post]
