Search for: "Borders v. Borders" Results 5101 - 5120 of 6,662
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2018, 9:45 pm by Andrew Hudson
A series of cases sought to clarify the defence in s123, for the benefit of brand owners, the most definitive of which was Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am by Ioannis Kouvakas
It examines how the United Kingdom likely would be in breach of international human rights law (IHRL) by interfering with the privacy and security of online users both within and outside of its borders, should it decide to move forward with the proposed revisions. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 5:42 pm by admin
The Requirements for a DUI Sobriety Checkpoint to be Legal Under the California Constitution In the 1987 case of Ingersoll v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:31 am by Emma Snell
This is according to a statement made by the press service of Yevgeny V. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:59 am by SHG
’ Lord Bingham, DPP v Collins (here). [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:39 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
He handles insurance defense matters all across Northeastern Pennsylvania as far west as Williamsport, PA, as far north as the New York border, as far east as the New Jersey border, and as far south as the Easton - Allentown - Jim Thorpe line of towns (i.e. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 12:00 pm by Ruth Levush
Sweden reportedly now has the greatest number of unaccompanied minors seeking asylum within its borders. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The Fifth Circuit—after consulting the Supreme Court's "delphic" ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am by Victoria VanBuren
Saionton was previously the law clerk to the Chief Justice of India, V N Khare. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:51 pm by WIMS
  Let's cut in a way that makes our neighborhoods, our schools and our borders stronger, not weaker. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:03 pm by Andrew J. Batog
  This is traditionally accomplished one of two ways, either through the principle of territoriality, whereby the sovereign has jurisdiction over any crime committed within its borders, or, by means of active or passive extra-territorial jurisdiction, whereby a sovereign may assert jurisdiction over a crime which has occurred outside of its borders because either the victim or offender is a national.[10] There are additional means of extraterritorial jurisdiction to be found,… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
This innovation opens doors for fractional ownership, liquidity, and cross-border investment. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm by admin
  Detroit was the scene for a landmark eminent-domain case, Poletown v. [read post]