Search for: "Born v. Born" Results 5101 - 5120 of 7,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Appellate Division Generally Accords Deference to Supreme Court's Determination Regarding Amount and Duration of Maintenance as Long as the Court Considers the Statutory Factors and Provides a Basis for its Conclusion                  In O’Connor v O’Connor, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 88226 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) the parties in this matrimonial action were married in 1986, they had three children (one born in 1990 and twins… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by Jon L. Gelman
Justica report on Circuit Court Split: "The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled [opinion] that the Social Security Act must provide for claimants' children who were born after their death. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
Such a conclusion was borne out by the fact that Novartis's CTM was endowed with a higher than normal degree of distinctiveness as it was a created and invented sign with no particular meaning. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:03 am
Just back from a week in the Low Countries.Much occurred on the work front – lectures at the ICTY and in the Cassese series; the 2011-in-review conference at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, which began with a live feed to the issuing of the Lubanga verdict at the International Criminal Court; and a hearing of the International Court of Justice in Belgium v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 8:50 pm by Lawrence Solum
The most striking example is provided by the balancing test announced in Mathews v. [read post]
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 As the prospect of a referendum on Scottish independence draws closer and those concerned with the destiny of British sterling, Scotch whisky and Chinese pandas intensify their discussions, questions have arisen meanwhile as to the legality of such a referendum and the judicial response to it. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:44 am by Clare Ciborowska
” Comment Two further cases ML and AR v RWB and SWB (2012) Fam Law 13 and Re P and L (2011) EWHC 343 1, the judgments of which post-date this appeal, attempted to lay down some guidance when dealing with cases which concern children born to two female parents and a known male parent. [read post]