Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 5101 - 5120 of 12,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2008, 1:24 pm
"); (b) that "coverage" is isolated from both the provider (MD, hospital, etc.) and the patient, in terms of cost of actual services, or economies in what superfluous high-dollar testing and examination may be undertaken (in the name of avoiding a 'malpractice" suit?) [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 1:26 pm by Ben Vernia
* * *The settlement resolves allegations that Genova: (a) improperly submitted claims to Medicare, TRICARE, and the federal employee health program for its IgG allergen, NutrEval and GI Effects lab test profiles because the tests were not medically necessary, (b) engaged in improper billing techniques, and (c) paid compensation to three phlebotomy vendors that violated the physician self-referral prohibition commonly known as the Stark Law. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:38 am by Ann Carlson
 That’s the conclusion of a recent Guardian article that criticizes Harvard’s David Keith and the Carnegie Institute’s Ken Caldeira for a) receiving outside money to study geoengineering; b)  having stakes in companies that are developing technology that could be used for geoengineering and c) advocating for additional government research into geoengineering. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 10:15 am
This is probably the decision (Case C? [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:12 am by Robert D. Forbes
 The agreement with the recipient must (a) must include a clear and conspicuous disclosure that the purpose of the agreement is to make telemarketing sales calls, (b) not be required as a condition of purchasing any good or service, (c) evidence the recipient’s willingness to receive calls made by or on behalf of a specific seller, and (d) include the customer’s telephone number and signature. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 5:00 pm
The Delta agent here in Birmingham tells me there's a good chance I'll miss my connection in Atlanta and there's no way the plane could wait even 5 minutes extra giving me time to take the train from concourse C to B. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 11:19 am by Paul Rosenzweig
There is more of course — we will, for example, get a new protected category of “critical infrastructure computers” that include those vital to public health and safety or national security and controlling: (A) gas and oil production, storage, and delivery systems; ‘‘(B) water supply systems; ‘‘(C) telecommunication networks; ‘‘(D) electrical power delivery systems; ‘‘(E) finance and banking systems; … [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 9:34 pm by Hull & Hull LLP
 However, the application is being accompanied by a motion record wherein we explain the circumstances of our case and seek a court order that a person in Ontario (an individual or trust company, as the case may be) be granted a Certificate of Ancillary Appointment of Estate Trustee. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
Although comment letters are company-specific, these are the types of comments we’d expect to see out of the Disclosure Review Program as the Staff assesses “Year 1” compliance for this rule. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
 Kraft Food Brands Group LLC, No 16-341 (Does the general and broad definition of “residence” found in 28 U.S.C. 1391(c) apply to the patent venue statute 1400(b)) BPCIA – Notice of Commercial Marketing: Apotex Inc., et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:33 am
IPCom therefore commenced infringement proceedings against the Finnish company in Germany. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
            The Rostholder decision arose out of a qui tam lawsuit filed by a pharmacist/operations manager against Omnicare, the parent company of his former employer, Heartland Repack Services (Heartland). [read post]