Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 12,893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2017, 12:46 pm
FAR 52.204-21(b)(1). [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:20 am
C-12-05860 CRB (N.D. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:22 am
This then becomes the new base price for the equipment. c. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 6:37 pm
In doing so, they applied the following test, [180] To impose liability on the defendant for the tort of passing off the plaintiff must satisfy me that: a) it enjoys goodwill attached to the educational services it provides; b) its services have acquired a distinctiveness in the marketplace; c) the defendant has caused confusion by intentionally or otherwise misrepresenting its services as those of the plaintiff; and d) the plaintiff is likely to suffer damage as a result of the… [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 8:18 am
In other words, if your company scores a C on its labor compliance, it may find itself at risk in all sorts of seemingly unrelated areas (beyond just fines for labor law non-compliance), such as income tax or environmental compliance. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 2:54 pm
There are a few exceptions to cyberstalking under the law such as Constitutionally protected speech or activity, and to the internet company or computer service provider who acts in good faith and is unaware of the specific nature of what was posted. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 1:45 pm
While most everyone refers to it as the “emancipation” statute (present company included), N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.67 never uses the term “emancipation”. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 8:00 am
The NLRB, however, included this demand in its subpoena (available in full here): If any document responsive to any request herein was withheld from production on the asserted ground that it is privileged, identify and describe the following: (a) author; (b) recipient; (c) date of original document; (d) subject matter of the document; and (e) nature of the privilege asserted. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 8:00 am
The NLRB, however, included this demand in its subpoena (available in full here): If any document responsive to any request herein was withheld from production on the asserted ground that it is privileged, identify and describe the following: (a) author; (b) recipient; (c) date of original document; (d) subject matter of the document; and (e) nature of the privilege asserted. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 7:25 am
The court of appeals found that it “did not have probable cause” even though the check had bounced and the phone company had apparently sent the plaintiff a letter in compliance with G.S. 14-107.1. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 7:25 am
The court of appeals found that it “did not have probable cause” even though the check had bounced and the phone company had apparently sent the plaintiff a letter in compliance with G.S. 14-107.1. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:16 am
With that in mind, an integration clause should accompany a buyer acknowledgment clause to properly limit the documents that constitute the parties’ agreement. c. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
§ 1712(a)-(c), the district court awarded $23,137.46 in attorneys’ fees and costs, and a $1,000 class representative incentive fee. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 8:54 am
For example, on PennDOT projects the prime contractor is required to submit (a) a monthly DBE status report (FORM EO-402); (b) an annual DBE Commercially Useful Function Report (FORM EO-354); and (c) a DBE Participation form (FORM EO-380). [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 8:54 am
For example, on PennDOT projects the prime contractor is required to submit (a) a monthly DBE status report (FORM EO-402); (b) an annual DBE Commercially Useful Function Report (FORM EO-354); and (c) a DBE Participation form (FORM EO-380). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:56 am
As our personal injury lawyers understand, due to their injuries, the women filed negligence lawsuits against (a) the Florida Dept. of Transportation; (b) the company which maintains the express lanes; and (c) the driver of the Toyota which caused the accident. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:02 am
Key Statutes and Precedent 45 C.F.R. 160.316 (HIPAA’s Privacy Rule) (A covered entity may not threaten, intimidate, coerce, harass, discriminate against, or take any other retaliatory action against any individual or other person for— (a) Filing of a complaint under §160.306; (b) Testifying, assisting, or participating in an investigation, compliance review, proceeding, or hearing under this part; or (c) Opposing any act or practice made unlawful by this… [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
