Search for: "DOES, 1-20"
Results 5101 - 5120
of 27,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
The state argues that White has repeatedly indicated that he does not wish to pursue an Atkins claim. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 2:03 pm
Simplistically rated in this model as having less than 20 customers = (-4), having between 20 and 100 customers = 0, and having greater than 100 customers = 4. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:12 pm
P. 47(c)(1). [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:55 pm
The trial court’s refusal to reopen its judgment, moreover, does not affect the application of claim preclusion. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 11:00 am
Appellants filed their revised brief on June 1, 2021 in which they argue that the FTC does not have the authority to impose some of the remedies that the FTC has imposed. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:50 am
Second, it has a flat 20 percent tax on individual income that does not apply to personal dividend income. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
A positive obligation by platforms to do so would lead to an interference with the freedom to conduct business under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and, potentially, the right to private property under the ECHR (Article 1 of Protocol 1 to the ECHR). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 12:09 pm
Does not need a formula approval due to the tremendously important liberalizations at TTB Ruling 2015-1 and the accompanying list of exempt ingredients and processes. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 5:10 pm
For instance, the home must be the borrower's residence. 12 USC §1715z-20(d)(3); 24 CFR §206.39. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:10 am
Step 1: Call your doctor. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 8:54 am
Only facilities that are at Phase 1 or better can allow in-person visits. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:02 am
Slip op. at 20. [read post]
3d Cir.: Employer Must Pay for All Breaks Shorter Than 20 Minutes Notwithstanding “Flex Time” Policy
20 Oct 2017, 3:43 am
On appeal, the defendant-employer raised three arguments: (1) that time spent logged off under its flexible break policy categorically does not constitute work; (2) that the District Court erred in finding that WHD’s interpretive regulation on breaks less than twenty minutes long, 29 C.F.R § 785.18, is entitled to substantial deference; and (3) that the District Court erred in adopting the bright-line rule embodied in 29 C.F.R. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 1:28 am
#1 does not make any sense. #2 could have a lot of possible explanations, none of them flattering. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
The 20% deduction for QBI does not reduce net earnings from self-employment or net investment income under the rules for the 3.8% surtax on net investment income. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:57 am
SLM Corp., 336 F.Supp.2d 1, 17 (D. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
The isolated DNA of claim 1, wherein said DNA has the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1. 5. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm
Analysis Liberally construing Carter's brief, we interpret Carter to assert the following points: (1) The agreement does not require an arbitration order to issue before an arbitration may be initiated under the arbitration clause [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:35 am
It’s also worth noting that even the Hobby Lobby employers provided coverage for 16 of the 20 contraceptives approved by the Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm
16: Award coverage threshold updated 15: ASIC’S monitoring of financial services providers 14: CAMAC Information Paper on Executive Remuneration 12: Fair go: unfair contracts 11: ASIC takes over market supervision 08: AUSTRAC orders external AML/CTF audit 06: ASIC relief applications August- November 2009 05: Super System Review Report released 05: Australian Information Commissioner: Privacy and Freedom of Information (1) 05: Credit risk and personal… [read post]
