Search for: "DOES 1-12" Results 5101 - 5120 of 28,889
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2019, 7:10 pm by Antoinette F. Konski
Claim 1 is representative, and reads: “A method for treating a patient with iloperidone, wherein the patient is suffering from schizophrenia, the method comprising the steps of: determining whether the patient is a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer by: obtaining or having obtained a biological sample from the patient; and performing or having performed a genotyping assay on the biological sample to determine if the patient has a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer genotype; an if the patient has a CYP2D6… [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 8:30 am by Terry Hart
Doe, No. 12 C 7163 (N.D. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
I find this case interesting because of the way in which Article 12(4) RPBA was invoked. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:29 am by Charles Sartain
  12/12/07 – The parties execute a Drilling Bid Proposal and Daywork Contract. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:22 pm
To GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. and Georgia Representative Timothy Bearden (R - Villa Rica) it does. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 12:00 am by Christoph Schmon
A positive obligation by platforms to do so would lead to an interference with the freedom to conduct business under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and, potentially, the right to private property under the ECHR (Article 1 of Protocol 1 to the ECHR). [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 10:14 am by Dennis Crouch
For instance, independent claims 1 and 12 require obtaining “rights associated with an item”—namely, a digital work—wherein the set of rights includes a “meta-right” specifying a “right” that may be created. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 11:37 pm
(s) If a motion for emergent medical care does not meet the requirements under this section, but does meet the requirements for a general motion for temporary and/or medical benefits under N.J.A.C. 12:235-3.3, the motion shall be listed and proceed as a general motion for temporary and/or medical benefits. 12:235-3.4 Insurance carrier or self-insured employer contact person procedures pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-15.4 (a) Every insurance carrier… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Does this mean that the patent proprietor has given up those claims? [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:21 am by Tessa Shepperson
No exceptions The Judge does not have the legal power to refuse to order the penalty (see that the clause above uses the word ‘must’), all he can do is decide whether the penalty should be 1, 2 or 3 x the deposit sum. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities.[1] He is also an adjunct professor at American University Washington College of Law. [read post]