Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 5101 - 5120 of 29,821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2020, 3:07 am
Societe des Bains de Mer et du Cercle des Etrangers a Monaco, 329 F.3d 359, 66 USPQ2d 1705, 1715-16 (4th Cir. 2003). [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
On 28 January 2020, Steyn J handed down the judgement in DXB v Persons Unknown [2020] EWHC 134 (QB), a claim brought pursuant to “the Venables jurisdiction” for an extension of the anonymity of a child defendant beyond his 18th birthday. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 2:22 pm by Ilya Somin
For many decades, the 1868 impeachment of Andrew Johnson was seen as a grave error, and John F. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Alan Z. Rozenshtein
The president takes an oath to “faithfully execute the office of President of the United States” and, “to the best of [his] ability, [to] preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 10:58 am by Heather Joy
O texto da Convenção conceitua a violência contra a mulher como “qualquer ato ou conduta baseada no gênero, que cause morte, dano ou sofrimento físico, sexual ou psicológico à mulher, tanto na esfera pública como na esfera privada”. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
For present purposes, the more relevant circuit split is 11-1: that is, the number of circuit courts in which the Government has vigorously argued that software can be a tracking device under the TDS versus the number of circuits in which Government has taken the opposite view.[9]  Even the most talented appellate advocate would have night sweats trying to defend the short end of that stick. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 9:26 am by skelly
However, the insurance industry and state insurance regulators were quick to defend their turf and successfully established an insurance product carve-out from the new swap definition. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:56 am by R. David Donoghue
P. 12(f) motion to strike plaintiff-counterdefendant TWD’s affirmative defenses in this Lanham Act case involving the THIS WE’LL DEFEND mark. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Plaintiff in this  action sought a declaration that the Defendants' failure to consider and appoint female candidate on the eligible list established from a civil service examination for the position of  juvenile counselor with the New York City Administration for Children's Services (ACS) violated the State and City Human Rights Laws (Executive Law §296[1][a]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 8-107[1][a]). [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Plaintiff in this  action sought a declaration that the Defendants' failure to consider and appoint female candidate on the eligible list established from a civil service examination for the position of  juvenile counselor with the New York City Administration for Children's Services (ACS) violated the State and City Human Rights Laws (Executive Law §296[1][a]; Administrative Code of the City of NY § 8-107[1][a]). [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post (subscription required), Steven Mazie worries that “[i]f the tenor of the oral argument [in Espinoza v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:37 pm by John Lewis
The Seventh Circuit distinguished the Fifth Circuit decision In re JPMorgan Chase & Company, 916 F. 3d 494 (5th Cir. 2019), because the plaintiffs there did not contest the coverage or validity of the arbitration agreements. [read post]