Search for: "English v. English" Results 5101 - 5120 of 11,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2015, 1:46 pm by Eric C. Chaffee
Rupert Macey-Dare has posted Key Derivatives Cases 2015 on SSRN with the following abstract: The paper considers key derivatives cases in the English courts from 2015, namely: Wani v Royal Bank of Scotland, Dexia v Commune di Prato, Enasarco v... [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In plain English, if you breach a legal duty to someone and cause foreseeable injury that causes damages, you are liable for a tort. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:09 pm by John C. Manoog III
City of Somerville Massachusetts Town Owed Duty of Care to Student-Athlete on Visiting Varsity Baseball Team – Murray v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The ability of English courts to excise trivial claims from the daily court lists has been given legislative punch with the enactment of section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013, which requires plaintiffs to surmount the “serious harm” threshold in order to establish liability. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:31 pm
Case T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu, a General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) decision going back to 7 July, is one of those decisions that has been sitting in this Kat's in-tray for far too long. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 2:53 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  We don't do ads on this blog, but I will tell you where to get this one.The statute Bill referred to is the one involved in the Supreme Court's "fish overboard" case of last term, Yates v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On the question of whether the decisions to authorise continued segregation fall within the ECHR, art 6(1) to mean the prisoner is entitled to a hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal, the Supreme Court noted that this depends on whether the decision involves the determination of a civil right recognised by English law. [read post]